1 referat.ro

download referat

THE FIRST PARTIAL REVIEW OF BIRIS' TOTALITATE SI COMPLEMENTARITATE In logic, usually, the opposites are 'repulsing' each other (eg., the contradictors), not alike physics where, usually, the opposites are attracting each other (eg., the electrical charges). (Dãnilã Ioan Marian, 2004) Of course, Bohr's postulate surprise, additive to the need of perspectival analysis, also the idea of subject-object interaction in the process of knowledge, relativizing both the one and the other one. The ideea is deep, touching in epoch, simultaneously two objectives: additive to a positive integration of Heisenberg's sceptical implications, it is doing apeal at the requirement to consider the phenomena in their totality, in ensemble, because neither one perspective, nor other, does not succed, each in part, to exhaust the data of the object of known. Bot, Bohr's idea of complementarity, it is not equivalent with that of philosophical totality, in its marxist meaning, not even with that of dialectic contradiction, though sometimes have been done such approachings. Complementarity as epistemologic principle, leaving in behind the rigid interpretations by which a term of the duality dress a ghostlike character, does not make the road until to the dialectic contradiction, but it is centering itself on the the principle of contrariety. From here also its most syntetical wording given to the principle: ,,contraria non contradictoria sed complementa sunt” (Bohr). The fact that by complementarity it is supposed the reciprocal understanding of the terms which should be relationed seems to show that we are in the core of antagonic contradictions. In reality it is excluded only the possibility of representational simultaneity (or of simultaneous representation). Cause the two terms which should be united in a synthesis, the wave and the corpuscle, co-exist, is right, in succession, but coexist. They cannot be (fiintza) simultaneously, are not true in the same time. Logically, the principle of noncontradiction is respected. The undulatory and corpusculary characters of the quantic object are positive and alternative realities, they are repulsing each other, are heterogeneous, but can stay close by, one after other, in a same series. The complementarity is proving itself as being no something else than contrariety. The complementary image represents ,,the logical sum” of the heterognous from series. Here we have not conflict, the opposites are repulsing each other as distincts which subsit by theirselves, but this repulsion is a ,,calm” one, as much as to manifest each other the individuality, alike to the alternatives from a inclusive disjunction.(Biris, 1985, p. 49-50) As in all Biris' articles which a I criticized until now, Biris wants to carry the inconsistent interpretations and opinions from an imperfect stage of physical science to sustain and confirm a dialectic, contradictory thought. From the first page of its Totalitate si